Questions tagged [falsifiability]
The falsifiability of a hypothesis or statement, i.e. the inherent possibility of making observations that can prove the hypothesis wrong.
95 questions
4
votes
11
answers
1k
views
Falsifiability of religious language
I understand (or thought I understood) Popper's falsification principle. For a statement to be meaningful it has to be falsifiable. That I can get on board with. But then I looked at it in regards to ...
7
votes
5
answers
1k
views
How can a theory be discarded if the Duhem–Quine thesis suggests it can’t be falsified?
From my understanding of the Duhem-Quine thesis, it seems that theories can’t be refuted Popper-style. But then how can one make sure that some theory can’t work as an explanation for a phenomenon?
0
votes
1
answer
98
views
Can we define a scientific theory as a non-empty set of falsifiable statements?
Below is the definition, sourced from Wikipedia, empasis mine:
Thornton says that basic statements are statements that correspond to
particular "observation-reports". He then gives Popper's ...
0
votes
1
answer
109
views
Classical Utilitarianism and falsifiability?
I was watching Ian Shapiro's account of Bentham's classical Utilitarianism. Here is an abridged version of a discusion between him and his students:
Prof: Now, I'm going to make five points about ...
1
vote
3
answers
548
views
Has reductive physicalism been falsified?
This answer to Does asking counterfactual questions about the context/conditions of one's birth presuppose the existence of souls? proposed an alternative view:
Alternative: Reductive physicalism
...
-4
votes
2
answers
169
views
Shoudn’t the obscurantism of the supernatural automatically deem it extremely implausible? [closed]
Suppose that one asked you to consider the plausibility of a functioning iPhone 14 forming by complete chance (i.e. without design). As far as I understand, this is actually possible, according to ...
4
votes
2
answers
477
views
Epistemic Concern Regarding Black Holes [closed]
A lot of work has been done in recent years regarding black holes, especially in the area of thermodynamics. However this raises in me a philosophical concern: since not even light can escape a black ...
1
vote
5
answers
405
views
Is falsifiability a wrong standard for deciding if a theory is "scientific"?
This question stems from a comment by @Conifold:
"Falsifiability" is a wrong standard that is no longer used (if it ever was) because any theory can be "saved" by suitable ...
4
votes
11
answers
1k
views
Is the principle of physical causal closure falsifiable?
From Wikipedia:
Physical causal closure is a metaphysical theory about the nature of causation in the physical realm with significant ramifications in the study of metaphysics and the mind. In a ...
4
votes
3
answers
133
views
Are there domains of enquiry where nonfalsifiability is a good thing, and if so is this formalised?
In science, falsifiability of a theory is considered a good thing because as per Popper if a empirical evidence can show that a theory is false, then the theory can be replaced by another which has ...
1
vote
1
answer
68
views
Is falsifiability precision, knowability, or both?
I have sometimes heard people say that there is merit in formulating claims that are “falsifiable”.
I can imagine that “falsifiable” means “can be falsified”, and “falsified” means “judged, determined,...
6
votes
7
answers
3k
views
Is mind-body dualism falsifiable?
I've previously asked Is epiphenomenalism falsifiable?, which was well-received, so I’d like to explore a follow-up. Are there any versions of mind-body dualism that make testable predictions, thus ...
4
votes
6
answers
2k
views
Is epiphenomenalism falsifiable?
In the debate on the nature of consciousness, especially concerning views like epiphenomenalism, can we design experiments to test whether consciousness, regardless of its underlying nature, has ...
2
votes
0
answers
68
views
Does critical theory have any implications for unfalisifiable theories?
As science pursues truth but is not independent of man, does the true nature of society, especially its economic base, bear on currently unfalisfiable physical theories?
Horkheimer thinks that there ...
3
votes
1
answer
162
views
Is Karl Popper's falsificationism self-refuting?
I am referring here not to falsification as a tool used to judge if something is good science, but rather to judge the meaning of statements such as "God exists".
Suppose that Flew's parable ...